Re: Hg [was:] What's up

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Timothy M. Shead<tshead@...> wrote:
> The main hurdle in adopting hg is the lack of CTest support, which
> complicates things (you could still hack something together with a

Do you know if there is a chance we will see Mercurial support in
release of CTest anytime soon? I found these links:
http://www.mail-archive.com/cmake@.../msg17597.html
http://public.kitware.com/Bug/view.php?id=7879

There is very little response, however. Maybe we should bring it up
again on the CMake list?

> I guess another alternative would be to switch to hg for normal
> development in the short-erm, but have a process of automatically
> pushing changes to svn, where it would be accessible to dashboard clients.

Yes, this also has the advantage that the source code remains more
accessible, since I get the feeling people may be a bit scared by
having to use something "obscure" like Mercurial.

Cheers,

--
Bart

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
K3d-development mailing list
K3d-development@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/k3d-development