On 05/01/2012 11:19 PM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Sorry for the delays,
No problem.
>
> Le 25 avr. 2012 à 19:36, Eric Blake a écrit :
>
>> On 04/07/2012 05:48 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I would like bison to used gnulib's build-aux/po/Makefile.in.in,
>>> but I don't understand how I am supposed to do that. bison's
>>> bootstrap is sync'ed with that of gnulib (the current master).
>>
>> Revisiting this topic, WHY are we trying to use gnulib's
>> build-aux/po/Makefile.in.in?
>
> To address a bug in gettext that hits the packages that use it:
> install-pdf and such other recursive targets are not supported.
>
> See
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2011-05/msg00008.html> for the first report, and
>
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gettext/2012-04/msg00003.html> for its recent reactivation.
I think I figured it out, and that we reached an acceptable compromise:
if you _want_ the latest and greatest gettext support, use the 'gettext'
module, and get Makefile.in.in from gnulib; if you want stable gettext
support (and don't mind GNU Coding Standard compliance), use the
'gettext-h' module and get Makefile.in.in from autopoint instead.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-04/msg00164.htmlMeanwhile, no one ever reviewed my proposed doc patch:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-04/msg00167.html--
Eric Blake
eblake@... +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library
http://libvirt.org