Thanks for the response. From what I gather, adding the _cache fields to my VO seems a little dirty.
Does anyone know if DjangoAMF handles this dilemma in a cleaner manner?
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Joel
<imlowdown@...> wrote:
"I personally hate this and wish it was either cleaner or more controllable (in an easy way)."
I should add, but not so much that I get off my lazy butt and contribute to the project in a meaningful way. Thanks PyAmf dev team, you guys are awesome! I would like to turn off the caching globally though :>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Joel
<imlowdown@...> wrote:
http://pastebin.com/m2ffcb77d
I use these methods to grab related models and whatnot.
ReferenceError: Error #1056: Cannot create property _title_cache on com.myproject.models.vo.BookVO
If you create a TitleVO object and then make a _title_cache:TitleVO property it will do some ORM bits. I personally hate this and wish it was either cleaner or more controllable (in an easy way).
-joel
_______________________________________________
PyAMF users mailing list - users@...
http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
PyAMF users mailing list -
users@...
http://lists.pyamf.org/mailman/listinfo/users