Todd,
I really don't know. Is there a URL where I can observe this conflict?
David
Todd Chapman wrote:
> David,
>
> So can you think of any reason why Timeline 1.0 might interfere with
> jQuery such that we have to use jQuery in noConflict mode? Thanks.
>
> -Todd
>
> On 2/4/08, David Huynh <
dfhuynh@...> wrote:
>
>> Which version of Timeline are you using? 1.0? or 2.0 here
>>
http://static.simile.mit.edu/timeline/api-2.0/timeline-api.js>>
>> David
>>
>> Todd Chapman wrote:
>>
>>> We have our own jQuery at the latest version. Perhaps we should excise
>>> jQuery from Timeline and tell it where to find our Query?
>>>
>>> On 2/1/08, *Axel Hecht* <
l10n.moz@...
>>> <mailto:
l10n.moz@...>> wrote:
>>>
>>> AFAICT, timeline includes SimileAjax, which itself has jQuery1.2.1
>>> in it.
>>>
>>> Not precisely sure what you want, do you want jquery, or do you have
>>> your own non-jquery stuff using $? Or do you want a different version
>>> of jquery?
>>>
>>> Axel
>>>
>>> 2008/2/1, Todd Chapman <
todd@... <mailto:
todd@...>>:
>>> > For some reason Timeline messes up some jQuery modal stuff our
>>> designers
>>> > built.
>>> >
>>> > I realize that jQuery has a noconflict mode, but our designers
>>> are used to
>>> > using the jQuery "$" shortcut. Is there a noconflict mode for
>>> Timeline? Has
>>> > anyone run into this problem before?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >
>>> > -Todd
>>>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
General@...
http://simile.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/general