Jim Maul escribió:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> On 30.07.07 13:25, Spamassassin List wrote:
>>> Any idea for qmail?
>>
>> if you excuse a big of irony, I'd say: drop it. There are many better
>> MTA's than qmail. There's imho much less worse solutions...
>
> According to who, you?
>
> He asked for a solution for qmail. If you do not know, it would be
> better to just not respond than to suggest he swap out his whole setup.
>
> Thanks anyway.
>
>
LoL. qmail rocks.
That said, I use qmail -> simscan -> spamassassin.
Although in my case I silently drop spam at smtp time, simscan can be
configured to reject and return the spam mail to the sender with an
error message, which can be customized.
/regards
