On 2012-03-01 18:20 Stephen Farrell said:
> The text below was a discuss point I raised on a document that
> maybe turns out to be a tools issue.
> RFC 3926 on the tools page doesn't show any IPR 
Hmm. That's not good. My first guesses at the reason (which was
that the export from the datatracker had broken with the big
upgrade) turned out to be wrong. I need to dig deeper down to
find out why  doesn't show one.
> But there is one. 
> The RFC3926bis draft  has a new IPR declaration 
> I got confused by the lack of visibility of  and wrote up
> that discuss.
> Is this a case of the new IPR declaration messing up the
> link between the base RFC and its IPR declaration or something?
Shouldn't be so -- the obvious reasons I looked for didn't fly.