Re: Improved image properties dialog (0.48)

View: New views
1 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Parent Message unknown Re: Improved image properties dialog (0.48)

by Guillermo Espertino :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message

Thanks for all the feedback about this specification. I'm collecting the
information to improve my blueprint
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Image_properties_dialog_enhancements

Feel free to modify it adding things that I missed.
Please keep in mind that the original proposal is to improve the
usability of the current image properties dialog, not to provide a
complete media manager (there are two extra specifications for that
already started).
I tried to keep things simple, modifying something that already exist in
order to solve some common problems.
I'm sure there is a lot of people who is, like me, comfortable with the
current behavior of linked/embedded images, and would like just to have
a handy way to re-link images or solve broken links easily.
It also looks as a solution feasible in short term, being less ambitious
than a complete media manager for all the data collection.

In my honest oppinion, I'd prefer to have a decent solution for the next
version instead of having to endure the current behavior for the next
two or three versions waiting for the allmighty media manager.
There are lots of minor details that keep being postponed waiting for
the next great refactor, but meanwhile mean a hit in usability that can
be really dissapointing for regular users.
Inkscape 0.47 is great and I love the new features, but there are still
minor things that turn into a big headache in everyday use (being unable
to choose another type units than pixels, the recent regression in the
selection area of clipped objects are clear examples of that).
Among those things, the lack of a simple "browse" button in the image
properties dialog seems a simple change that would make everyday use
much easier.
I'm not against big features at all, but maybe it's not the best thing
if we define an ambitious, gigantic blueprint for each minor usability
fix that comes up.
A less pretentious solution could drag the attention of a group of
students, like Steren's for instance. An ambitious specification would
bump with the usual lack of developers and keep resting as a future
project for a long time.

Please take this as a constructive criticism and not as an attack to the
decisions that inkscape developers have taken.  Unfortunatly I'm not
able to contribute with code and I can't fix things myself.

Gez


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel