Re: Instance scope
|
View:
New views
8 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
Re: Instance scope
by jason.r.cronk
::
Rate this Message:
You're on the right track. Instead of calling member.lname and
member.fname you'll be calling the functions member.getlname() or member.getfname(). That helps preserve encapsulation. If you want to return everything then use something like getAttributes that return a structure. <invoke class="member" methodcall="get(url.memberid)" returnVariable="member" /> <set name="fieldname" value="member.getAttributes()"> Then you can reference each field as fieldname.lname and fieldname.fname. Jason Cronk jason.r.cronk@... "Mark Kecko" <mark@... To: "Fusebox" <fusebox@...> om> cc: Subject: Re: Instance scope 04/15/2005 02:39 PM Please respond to fusebox So I changed all of my instance variables inside my component to the variables scope. After I did this everything seemed to work fine until I tried to reference my member object. I'm calling the object with invoke in my FB4.1 circuit file like: <invoke class="member" methodcall="get(url.memberid)" returnVariable="member" /> I used to reference my object on my dsp pages like member.fname and member.lname (when I was using the instance scope) but now that doesn't work anymore. I get fname is undefined in member. I'm guessing with my current component setup that I'll have to create a controller cfc or have a function in my member.cfc like getName and then say member.getname() on my dsp page to display the persons name. Am I on the right track or am I missing something entirely? Member.cfc component full listing--------------------------------------- <cfcomponent displayname="Member Entity"> <cffunction name="init" access="public" output="false" returntype="membermanager.model.member"> <cfargument name="aid" type="numeric" default="0"> <cfset var member_select = 0/> <cfset var member_last_update = 0/> <cfscript> variables.aid = arguments.aid; variables.fname = ""; variables.lname = ""; variables.company = ""; </cfscript> <cfif variables.aid neq 0> <cfquery name="member_select" maxrows="1" datasource="mp2"> select * from members where m_aid = <cfqueryparam value="#arguments.aid#" cfsqltype="cf_sql_integer"> </cfquery> <cfif member_select.recordcount eq 1> <cfscript> variables.aid = member_select.m_aid; variables.fname = member_select.m_fname; variables.lname = member_select.m_lname; variables.company = member_select.m_company; </cfscript> </cfif> </cfif> <cfreturn this> </cffunction> <cffunction name="get" access="public" output="false" returntype="membermanager.model.member"> <cfargument name="aid" type="numeric" required="true"> <cfset init(arguments.aid)> <cfreturn this> </cffunction> </cfcomponent> Mark Kecko Technology Director MediaPost Communications mark@... 212-204-2002 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6764 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=17837.14401.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 |
|
|
Re: Instance scope
by Brian Kotek
::
Rate this Message:
Jason you just responded to message that was posted over two months ago. ;-)
On 6/17/05, jason.r.cronk@... <jason.r.cronk@...> wrote: > > You're on the right track. Instead of calling member.lname and > member.fname you'll be calling the functions member.getlname() or > member.getfname(). That helps preserve encapsulation. > > > If you want to return everything then use something like getAttributes > that > return a structure. > > <invoke class="member" methodcall="get(url.memberid)" > returnVariable="member" /> > <set name="fieldname" value="member.getAttributes()"> > > Then you can reference each field as fieldname.lname and fieldname.fname. > > > Jason Cronk > jason.r.cronk@... > > > > > > "Mark Kecko" > <mark@... To: "Fusebox" <fusebox@...> > om> cc: > Subject: Re: Instance scope > 04/15/2005 02:39 > PM > Please respond to > fusebox > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6765 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=17837.14401.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Instance scope
by Mark Kecko
::
Rate this Message:
Your response is appreciated, despite its timing!
Mark Kecko Technology Director MediaPost Communications mark@... 212-204-2002 jason.r.cronk@... wrote: > I'm slow!! No, actually I wasn't paying attention, just going through my > new mail, hitting delete or responding. My mail must have pulled up the > message and I just assumed it was new. DOH! > > Jason Cronk > jason.r.cronk@... > > > > > "Brian Kotek" > <brian428@... To: "Fusebox" <fusebox@...> > om> cc: > Subject: Re: Instance scope > 06/17/2005 05:26 > PM > Please respond to > fusebox > > > > > > > Jason you just responded to message that was posted over two months ago. > ;-) > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Stay Ahead of Hackers - Download ZoneAlarm Pro http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=65 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6767 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=17837.14401.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 |
|
|
RE: Instance scope
by gabriel l smallman
::
Rate this Message:
Hey guys, this just sparked a thought. Does the fusebox parser support
something like this for passing in arguments: <invoke class="member" methodcall="get()" returnVariable="member" /> <argument name="memberid" value="#url.memberid#"> </invoke> thanks gabe -----Original Message----- From: Brian Kotek [mailto:brian428@...] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 5:26 PM To: Fusebox Subject: Re: Instance scope Jason you just responded to message that was posted over two months ago. ;-) On 6/17/05, jason.r.cronk@... <jason.r.cronk@...> wrote: > > You're on the right track. Instead of calling member.lname and > member.fname you'll be calling the functions member.getlname() or > member.getfname(). That helps preserve encapsulation. > > > If you want to return everything then use something like getAttributes > that return a structure. > > <invoke class="member" methodcall="get(url.memberid)" > returnVariable="member" /> > <set name="fieldname" value="member.getAttributes()"> > > Then you can reference each field as fieldname.lname and fieldname.fname. > > > Jason Cronk > jason.r.cronk@... > > > > > > "Mark Kecko" > <mark@... To: "Fusebox" <fusebox@...> > om> cc: > Subject: Re: Instance scope > 04/15/2005 02:39 > PM > Please respond to > fusebox > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6768 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=17837.14401.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 |
|
|
Re: Instance scope
by Sean Corfield
::
Rate this Message:
On 6/18/05, gabriel l smallman <gabe@...> wrote:
> Hey guys, this just sparked a thought. Does the fusebox parser support > something like this for passing in arguments: No. And I don't see a need for it. You can specify named arguments directly if you need to: <invoke class="member" methodcall="get(memberid=url.memberid)" returnVariable="member" /> BTW, in your code, you are closing the <invoke> verb before the <argument> verb anyway which is illegal syntax: > <invoke class="member" methodcall="get()" > returnVariable="member" /> > <argument name="memberid" value="#url.memberid#"> > </invoke> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how to get a fax number that sends and receives faxes using your current email address http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=64 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6769 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=17837.14401.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 |
|
|
RE: Instance scope
by gabriel l smallman
::
Rate this Message:
Shoot,
I find it hard to read if you have a ton of arugments to pass in. Oh well. thanks for feedback. gabe -----Original Message----- From: Sean Corfield [mailto:seancorfield@...] Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2005 4:48 PM To: Fusebox Subject: Re: Instance scope On 6/18/05, gabriel l smallman <gabe@...> wrote: > Hey guys, this just sparked a thought. Does the fusebox parser support > something like this for passing in arguments: No. And I don't see a need for it. You can specify named arguments directly if you need to: <invoke class="member" methodcall="get(memberid=url.memberid)" returnVariable="member" /> BTW, in your code, you are closing the <invoke> verb before the <argument> verb anyway which is illegal syntax: > <invoke class="member" methodcall="get()" > returnVariable="member" /> > <argument name="memberid" value="#url.memberid#"> </invoke> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6770 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=17837.14401.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 |
|
|
Re: Instance scope
by Sean Corfield
::
Rate this Message:
On 6/20/05, gabriel l smallman <gabe@...> wrote:
> I find it hard to read if you have a ton of arugments to pass in. Oh well. > thanks for feedback. Maybe your function is doing too much then? Long argument lists are not good practice (because, as you note, they can be hard to read and therefore hard to maintain). -- Sean A Corfield -- http://corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 50, yes 50, invites to give away! "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:12:6771 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/12 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:12 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=17837.14401.12 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54 |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
