There is problem but we work on it and each new release is faster
then previous one.
And Guillaume is right that such benchmarks shows almost nothing.
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 12:09 AM, deamon <
christian.helmbold@...> wrote:
>
> >> JRuby is also a dynamic language with metaclasses on the jvm and is much
> >> faster than ruby.
>
> I wanted to write "faster than groovy" here.
>
>
> > Ruby is a pretty slow language.
>
> But in these benchmarks Ruby outperforms Groovy.
>
>
> Again, microbenchmarks like these are not something I'd rely on, but
> I'd work on a plausible scenario and make my measures of my use cases
> myself.
>
> To evaluate technlogy for real life use this would be the best way.
> Nevertheless I'm worried about Groovy performance because the differences
> are so dramatic.
>
> Christian
> --
> View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Is-Groovy-the-slowest-dynamic-language--tp15667109p15669404.html> Sent from the groovy - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
