« Return to Thread: Is MULE-2069 (Address already in use) really 100% Fixed?

Re: Is MULE-2069 (Address already in use) really 100%Fixed?

by Florent Legendre :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread


Hello Andrew,
I must have misunderstood the "Comments" log for this issue in Jira: I saw
that you wrote on the 25th of july that MULE-2069 does not solve the
address already in use error, but as your comment from the 31st of july
(when you closed it) doesn´t mention anything I though that you somehow
managed to fix everything. My bad :)

When it comes to finding a solution I noticed several things:

 * First the connector used by the remote dispatcher on the client is not
configured the way it is on the server: reuseAddresse is null. This
probably makes sense as the MuleClient probably needs a working tcp
connection to obtain its RemoteDispatcher, but I was expecting the
MuleClient to somehow "mimic" the mule server configuration.
 * I am therefore configuring the MuleCient as well, and set reuseAddress
to true, but it doesn´t help.
 * One thing that works is setting keepSendSocketOpen to true but I´m not
sure this is a solution (sounds more like a hack). Any opinions on that
Andrew?

What do you meant by linger and threading I don´t know what linger is in
this context, and I do not see how threading is going to help?

Thanks for helping me, I will follow the issue you opened!
Florent

On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:23:38 -0400 (CLT), "andrew cooke"
<acooke@...> wrote:

>>
>> Hello,
>> Jira issue MULE-2069 could be the same as the one I experience now; Are
>> you sure that it is fixed?
>
> that issue was to add the reuse address option and was closed when that
> option was added.  it says *in the issue* that adding that option didn't
> solve the "address in use" error.
>
> so there are several different problems here:
> 1 - was the reuse address option added correctly?
> 2 - does it have any effect at all on the problem?
> 3 - if it doesn't cure the problem completely, what else can we do?
>
> i think the answers are (1: hopefully; 2: some; 3: look at linger and
> threading).
>
> i have raised an issue for this error -
> http://mule.mulesource.org/jira/browse/MULE-2301
>
> andrew
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
>     http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--
---
Florent Legendre


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

 « Return to Thread: Is MULE-2069 (Address already in use) really 100% Fixed?