« Return to Thread: Is ets:insert/2 (with multiple objects) isolated with respect to concurrent readers?

Re: Is ets:insert/2 (with multiple objects) isolated with respect to concurrent readers?

by Chris Newcombe-2 :: Rate this Message:

> I will make that guarantee more explicit in the documentation for next
> release.

Excellent -- thankyou very much!

Chris

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:02 AM, Sverker
Eriksson<sverker@...> wrote:

> Ulf Wiger wrote:
>>
>> Chris Newcombe wrote:
>>>
>>> Please could the isolation behavior be officially documented for
>>> ets:insert, ets:insert_new, and ets:delete_all_objects?
>>
>> Granted, you're asking for official documentation, and I
>> agree that this is important.
>>
> As Ulf mentioned; insert, insert_new and delete_all_objects are all both
> atomic and isolated.
>
> I can't see that we ever would want (and dare) to break that.
> I will make that guarantee more explicit in the documentation for next
> release.
>
> /Sverker, Erlang/OTP
>
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
erlang-questions (at) erlang.org

« Return to Thread: Is ets:insert/2 (with multiple objects) isolated with respect to concurrent readers?