« Return to Thread: Is the rails 2.0 scaffold system philosophically ( not technically? ) broken?

Re: Is the rails 2.0 scaffold system philosophically ( not t

by Tony Martin :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread


OK - so I'm having a bad day and hit send before I'd finished!!

I should have added that:

http://ryandaigle.com/
http://blog.hasmanythrough.com/
http://calicowebdev.com/blog

look to be really good resources that I have now subscribed to:

I agree with you about avoiding scaffolding.  Actually, I tend to keep
a sample scaffold to hand as a 'for example', but that's about all.  I
note your the reference in your blog to make_resourceful.  I suspect
there may well be times when this could make life easier.

Thanks
Tonypm
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

 « Return to Thread: Is the rails 2.0 scaffold system philosophically ( not technically? ) broken?