On Mar 3, 10:47 am, "Brian Hogan" <
bpho...@...> wrote:
> it's much easier
> to start them on Rails 1.x and move to Rails 2.0 and REST later.
This suggestion worries me a little, because I have found that the
conversion is not simple.
If version 2.0 is compellingly superior to 1.x, then newbies should
start there. (Using the latest stable version is a long-standing
tradition in software, because it is effective.) Nothing in this long
and useful discussion thread suggests that the RoR developers are
inclined to add the feature that is being discussed to an upcoming
version. And so there is a simple choice: use RoR 2.0 as it is, or
choose another framework. (This second option is not meant to be
heretical; newbies should be aware that there are alternatives.)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
