I believe you can still install it from a plugin if you're really
interested in it.
I think dynamic scaffolding was a crutch that kept people from really
getting Rails from the start (i.e., you didn't have to build views so
they were missing out on that). I think making them generate the code
gets them elbow deep in the sort of stuff they'll be writing quicker.
--Jeremy
On Jan 2, 2008 1:38 PM, Huw Collingbourne
<
rails-mailing-list@...> wrote:
>
> Jeremy McAnally wrote:
> > Scaffolds != Rails
> >
>
> No, but the simplicity of the Rails 1.x scaffold is what 'sold' Rails to
> a lot of people (e.g. via the famous DHH Blog app video on the Rails
> site). Personally, I think it would have been nice to have kept the
> 'backwards compatibility' intact so that newcomers would have ready
> access to all the Rails 1.0 tutorials available rather than trying to
> follow those tutorials and immediately running up against the buffers,
> so to speak... ;-)
>
> best wishes
> Huw
>
>
http://www.sapphiresteel.com> Ruby In Steel for Visual Studio
> --
> Posted via
http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>
>
> >
>
--
http://www.jeremymcanally.com/My books:
Ruby in Practice
http://www.manning.com/mcanally/My free Ruby e-book
http://www.humblelittlerubybook.com/My blogs:
http://www.mrneighborly.com/http://www.rubyinpractice.com/--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
rubyonrails-talk-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
