« Return to Thread: [DISCUSS] Evicting dirty instances
Re: JDO TCK 2.0 - Which set of tests to use?
by Michelle Caisse
::
Rate this Message:
You'll have to enter a challenge on those and we'll back port the
changes to a 2.0.x branch or add the test to the exclude list.
To initiate a challenge "send email to: jdo-dev@...
<mailto:jdo-dev@...> with a subject line containing
"CHALLENGE" and the name of the test program, e.g.
org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.ThreadSafe.java; and the body
of the email containing the details of the challenge." You can just
reference the JIRAs for the details.
Thanks,
Michelle
Ilan Kirsh wrote:
> Hi Michelle,
>
> That was very helpful. Running this branch looks much better.
>
> Still I have problems with the following tests:
>
> 1. FetchPlanInterface.testGroups (fixed in JDO-402, after 2.0.1?)
> 2. ResultClassRequirements.testNegative (fixed in JDO-524)
> 3. ChangeQuery.testPositive (fixed in JDO-529)
> 4. ImplicitParameters.testGrouping (fixed in JDO-530)
> 5. StateTransitionsReturnedObjects (JDO-513, JDO-514).
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks, Ilan
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michelle Caisse"
> <Michelle.Caisse@...>
> To: <jdo-dev@...>
> Cc: "JDO Expert Group" <jdo-experts-ext@...>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:46 PM
> Subject: Re: JDO TCK 2.0 - Which set of tests to use?
>
>
>> Hi Ilan,
>>
>> There is a source branch 2.01 with changes responsive to some earlier
>> challenges. There's a wiki page documenting the issues
>> http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/TCKChallenges. Please get this branch from
>> svn
>> and let us know if there are remaining issues.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michelle
>>
>> Ilan Kirsh wrote:
>>> Is there an approved exclude list for the original JDO 2 TCK 2.0
>>> that is more realistic than the bundled list of 2 enhancement tests?
>>>
>>> If not, when ready, I can publish my exclude list as a suggestion.
>>>
>>> Regards, Ilan
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: Craig L Russell To: JDO
>>> Expert Group Cc: Apache JDO project Sent:
>>> Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:32 PM
>>> Subject: Re: JDO TCK 2.0 - Which set of tests to use?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ilan,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Ilan Kirsh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The JDO 2 TCK 2.0 package that is available for download at:
>>> http://db.apache.org/jdo/releases/release-2.0.cgi
>>> contains many invalid tests that have been fixed since that
>>> release.
>>>
>>>
>>> Correct. The latest trunk has updated tests.
>>>
>>>
>>> In order to claim compliance with JDO 2 should I use the tests at:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/jdo/trunk/tck2-legacy/ ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, there's no official release of the JDO 2.1 test suite, so
>>> probably to claim compliance with JDO 2.0, you should update the
>>> exclude
>>> list and run the original tests. And you should take a look at the tck2
>>> project as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Should I fill CHALLENGE against tests in that set that IMO are
>>> invalid?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. We still have time to fix these before official release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your continued support.
>>>
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>
>>> Ilan Kirsh
>>> ObjectDB Software
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Craig Russell
>>>
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
>>> http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>>>
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
>>>
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
changes to a 2.0.x branch or add the test to the exclude list.
To initiate a challenge "send email to: jdo-dev@...
<mailto:jdo-dev@...> with a subject line containing
"CHALLENGE" and the name of the test program, e.g.
org.apache.jdo.tck.api.persistencemanager.ThreadSafe.java; and the body
of the email containing the details of the challenge." You can just
reference the JIRAs for the details.
Thanks,
Michelle
Ilan Kirsh wrote:
> Hi Michelle,
>
> That was very helpful. Running this branch looks much better.
>
> Still I have problems with the following tests:
>
> 1. FetchPlanInterface.testGroups (fixed in JDO-402, after 2.0.1?)
> 2. ResultClassRequirements.testNegative (fixed in JDO-524)
> 3. ChangeQuery.testPositive (fixed in JDO-529)
> 4. ImplicitParameters.testGrouping (fixed in JDO-530)
> 5. StateTransitionsReturnedObjects (JDO-513, JDO-514).
>
> Please advise.
>
> Thanks, Ilan
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michelle Caisse"
> <Michelle.Caisse@...>
> To: <jdo-dev@...>
> Cc: "JDO Expert Group" <jdo-experts-ext@...>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 8:46 PM
> Subject: Re: JDO TCK 2.0 - Which set of tests to use?
>
>
>> Hi Ilan,
>>
>> There is a source branch 2.01 with changes responsive to some earlier
>> challenges. There's a wiki page documenting the issues
>> http://wiki.apache.org/jdo/TCKChallenges. Please get this branch from
>> svn
>> and let us know if there are remaining issues.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Michelle
>>
>> Ilan Kirsh wrote:
>>> Is there an approved exclude list for the original JDO 2 TCK 2.0
>>> that is more realistic than the bundled list of 2 enhancement tests?
>>>
>>> If not, when ready, I can publish my exclude list as a suggestion.
>>>
>>> Regards, Ilan
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: Craig L Russell To: JDO
>>> Expert Group Cc: Apache JDO project Sent:
>>> Tuesday, September 25, 2007 7:32 PM
>>> Subject: Re: JDO TCK 2.0 - Which set of tests to use?
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ilan,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 25, 2007, at 10:18 AM, Ilan Kirsh wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The JDO 2 TCK 2.0 package that is available for download at:
>>> http://db.apache.org/jdo/releases/release-2.0.cgi
>>> contains many invalid tests that have been fixed since that
>>> release.
>>>
>>>
>>> Correct. The latest trunk has updated tests.
>>>
>>>
>>> In order to claim compliance with JDO 2 should I use the tests at:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/db/jdo/trunk/tck2-legacy/ ?
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, there's no official release of the JDO 2.1 test suite, so
>>> probably to claim compliance with JDO 2.0, you should update the
>>> exclude
>>> list and run the original tests. And you should take a look at the tck2
>>> project as well.
>>>
>>>
>>> Should I fill CHALLENGE against tests in that set that IMO are
>>> invalid?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. We still have time to fix these before official release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for your continued support.
>>>
>>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>>
>>> Ilan Kirsh
>>> ObjectDB Software
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Craig Russell
>>>
>>> Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System
>>> http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
>>>
>>> 408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@...
>>>
>>> P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
« Return to Thread: [DISCUSS] Evicting dirty instances
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
