Re: JDeveloper - Can I get a show of hands?

> I've always found that trying to do the UML thing just turns out to be more
> of a pain than it's worth.  For me, it's just easier to code the stuff.  You
> can generate UML from the code pretty easily (check out the yfiles Javadocs
> for an example that's generated using yworks' yDoc product).
>
> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Dane Laverty <danelaverty@...>wrote:
>
>> I've really enjoyed getting to use Maven on my recent projects. I'm no
>> Maven expert, but I'm finding that I don't have to be -- it really
>> just does a great job. Getting Maven working with JDeveloper has not
>> been going well so far, so that's been one hangup.
>>
>> There are a few reasons for the department-wide IDE mandate. Our
>> manager has just discovered UML (I don't know anything about it, to be
>> honest), and JDeveloper provides UML functionality out of the box,
>> while any of the free Eclipse UML plugins I could find required a
>> mountain of dependencies and don't appear to work as smoothly as the
>> JDev one. Also, we're trying to replace TOAD as our database tool, and
>> JDev looks like it can do that. The third reason is that most of our
>> applications are Oracle ApEx, and JDev has stuff for that too.
>>
>> I'm trying to port my existing apps to JDeveloper, but without much
>> success. The main problems so far are:
>> - How do I import a Wicket project using the Maven standard directory
>> layout? (I am aware of the Maven JDev plugin for JDev 10, but it has
>> issues with JDev 11)
>> - How do I run a Wicket app in JDeveloper using the internal WebLogic
>> server?
>> - Does JDeveloper have some sort of Maven-like functionality for
>> project lifecycle management?
>>
>> I imagine (hope) that most of these questions have easy answers, but
>> I'm just not finding a lot of relevant online
>> documentation/discussion. Most of the JDeveloper web app documentation
>> is focused on EJBs or basic Servlet/JSP-based apps.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:53 AM, James
>> Carman<jcarman@...> wrote:
>> > +1 on using Maven.  Most folks at our job site use eclipse, but I'm an
>> > IntelliJ junkie (they got me hooked many years ago and I can't break
>> > free).  For the most part, we don't have issues between environments,
>> > provided folks have their plugins set up correctly.
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Martijn Reuvers
>> > <martijn.reuvers@...> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> When you use ADF, then stick to JDeveloper you'll get a lot of
>> >> integration for your application and can really build applications
>> >> fast.
>> >>
>> >> However if you use open-source frameworks like wicket, you're better
>> >> off using one of the other IDE's (Netbeans, Eclipse, IntelliJ). Just
>> >> use maven or so, then your management has nothing to say, as it does
>> >> not really matter what IDE you use. I always say: Use whatever gets
>> >> the job done. =)
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 1:00 AM, Dane Laverty<danelaverty@...>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Our management has chosen to make JDeveloper 11g the required IDE for
>> >> > the department. Searching the Wicket mailing list archives, I find
>> >> > that there is very little discussion about JDev. I'd be interested to
>> >> > know, are any of you currently using JDeveloper as your main Wicket
>> >> > IDE?
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@...
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@...
>>
>>
>