Re: JMS Reply To Issue

Sorry Andrew i probably wasn't clear in my response.

I do not want to use Reply To at all, in fact i only use the Temporary Reply To as a result of the remoteSync operation, which is necessary. So my Broker A uses them.

The behaviour i am seeing however is that Mule Broker B wants to use the "JMS Reply To" message header of the inbound message as its Reply To as part of the JMSReplyToHandler.

This means that in the scenario i mentioned originally you either get

A) an error if one of the recipients of the jms message is running slowly (the JMSReplyToHandler of Broker B will error when trying to write to a temporary destination that Broker A has already deleted).

OR

B) Broker A posts to the temporary queue, then listens to it, AMQ Broker A posts the JMS reply and Mule Broker B also posts a message to the temporary queue as well.

Sorry if my explanation's aren't helping grammar is not one of my strong points...

Regards,

Richard