> Hi Josh.
>
> Yes, there is interest. In fact, I recently fixed some base issues
> to get our exporter going with the latest JavaFX. That was done in
> fair bit due to end user contact... that is, people who wanted to be
> using it asked about getting things fixed and gave some feedback,
> testing, etc.
Excellent!
> Some user used Twitter to point out this blog post:
>
http://lucasjordan.blogspot.com/2009/06/inkscape-and-javafx-almost-there.html>
> The corresponding initial fixes were under bug # 253869
>
https://bugs.launchpad.net/inkscape/+bug/253869>
> Using the test case from that blog post, I also figured out what the
> problem with the gradients are. If someone can enter specific bugs
> for those then I can probably get them fixed for 0.47.
>
> And in regards to .FXZ export itself there is definite interest. I
> think as a packaged-up container format there are some nice things
> that can be leveraged post 0.47. Among other things we've been
> wanting to add in an internal "media manager" to handle external
> files (bitmap images, ICC profiles, style sheets, etc). Including
> conceptual needs and such for .FXZ will probably help with the
> general solution also.
>
> (BTW, I noticed Martin Brehovsky commented on that bug after it was
> fixed)
Yes. Martin would be one of those aforementioned overworked
engineers. :)
So it definitely sounds like there is interest. How can I help you?
- J
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Inkscape-devel mailing list
Inkscape-devel@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/inkscape-devel
