« Return to Thread: Jencks joining an XA Transaction

Re: Jencks joining an XA Transaction

by rabueckers :: Rate this Message:

I also posted this a few minutes ago... it contains a snippet from my Spring config.
http://www.nabble.com/Jencks-2.0%5CHibernate%5CSpring-Multiple-data-sources-example--tf4699221.html

I will try to get you a Junit example... One of the first things the JUnit does in it's setUp() is begin a transaction, and then in the tearDown() if the transaction is not completed it does a rollback. Would this be considered the UserTransaction?

protected void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
setTransactionManager((PlatformTransactionManager)
getTestBean("transactionManager"));

beginTransaction();
}

protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
super.tearDown();
if (!isTransactionCompleted()) {
rollbackTransaction();
}
}

gnodet wrote:

How do you configure jencks ? Do you use a single transaction manager
? And how do you start the other transaction ?
If you could provide a junit test, it would be much easier to check
what's happening.

On 10/26/07, rabueckers <rabueckers@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Has anyone figured out how to get Jecks2.0 to do this?
>
> When I run my JUnit tests it appears Jencks2.0 is not using the transaction
> that was already started. However, when that initial transaction rolls back
> and the next test method is executed everything seems to work fine.
>
> Is there a easy way to either force Jencks to use the initial transaction,
> or drop the initial transaction and create a new one?
>
> I'm really struggling with this issue, so any help would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bob
>
> I'm using Jencks2.0\Junit\Oracle\Ant\Eclipse in a multiple data source
> configuration.
>
>
> Mad Andy wrote:
> >
> > I want to use an Outbound JDBC through Jencks but the transaction is
> > started and managed outside. It seems to me that in this case Jencks'
> > transaction manager is not joining the transaction.
> >
> > Is there a way to make Jenck's transaction manager joining an existing
> > transaction on the current thread rather than starting its own?
> >
> > Thanks - Andy Schaefer
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Jencks-joining-an-XA-Transaction-tf4207872.html#a13433144
> Sent from the jencks - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list please visit:
>
> http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>

--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list please visit:

http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email

« Return to Thread: Jencks joining an XA Transaction