> Could you run the map component in an iframe, to sandbox the JS, while
> using jQuery for the embedding page?
>
> Jörn
>
> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Sam Collett <sam.coll...@...> wrote:
> > Could this somehow be reported to the authors of these libraries that
> > practice this bad habit?
> > jQuery could be modified, but sacrificing performance just for one or two
> > scripts that do this seems detrimental (especially if it affects very few
> > users).
>
> > Maybe there should be a list of libraries that do this, stating that they
> > are incompatible with jQuery (and I expect other libraries as well)?
>
> > ViaMichelin have a developer blog, so I expect that this can be reported to
> > them (and maybe someone who can figure out the API can suggest a fix)?
> >http://dev-blog.viamichelin.com/
>
> > They also have a developer network:
> >http://dev.viamichelin.com/
>
> > 2008/6/4 John Resig <jere...@...>:
>
> >> > It seems to indicate that jQuery assumes that no properties have been
> >> > added to Object.prototype?
> >> > Is it possible that jQuery should be using hasOwnProperty in "for ...
> >> > in" loops?
>
> >> That is certainly an option - but at the cost of performance. We've
> >> done testing of this in the past and have, for now, opted to err on
> >> the side of performance instead of ubiquitous compatibility. We may
> >> change this eventually but that's our reasoning, for now.
>
> >> --John