> I sent an email to Renaud Euvrard (http://renaud.euvrard.com/) who is
> working at ViaMichelin. I found his name on this article (in French):http://www.journaldunet.com/developpeur/itws/071031-itw-viamichelin.s...
> where they are saying how good their API is. Guillaume Macaigne, the
> first name doesn't work at ViaMichelin anymore according to LinkedIn.
>
> Hoping he (or someone of the ViaMichelin team) will join this thread very soon.
>
> -- Yoan
>
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Adriano <adrianoma...@...> wrote:
>
> > Thank to you all for your kind replies...
>
> > unfortunately it looks that the ViaMichelin developer blog isn't
> > working very well... the form for signaling problems doesn't work....
>
> > To Jorn: we coud, but whe have to set up a three panes layout so we
> > are looking for a more simple solution, in the worst case we would be
> > trying something similar to what you said... Thanx!
>
> > it looks I'll have to switch to another framework, even if EXT also
> > gives a similar error... It's too bad since we where already utilising
> > jQuery for other things...
>
> > Ok, again, thank you all
>
> > Best regards
>
> > Adriano
>
> > On 4 Giu, 17:17, "Jörn Zaefferer" <joern.zaeffe...@...>
> > wrote:
> >> Could you run the map component in an iframe, to sandbox the JS, while
> >> using jQuery for the embedding page?
>
> >> Jörn
>
> >> On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Sam Collett <sam.coll...@...> wrote:
> >> > Could this somehow be reported to the authors of these libraries that
> >> > practice this bad habit?
> >> > jQuery could be modified, but sacrificing performance just for one or two
> >> > scripts that do this seems detrimental (especially if it affects very few
> >> > users).
>
> >> > Maybe there should be a list of libraries that do this, stating that they
> >> > are incompatible with jQuery (and I expect other libraries as well)?
>
> >> > ViaMichelin have a developer blog, so I expect that this can be reported to
> >> > them (and maybe someone who can figure out the API can suggest a fix)?
> >> >http://dev-blog.viamichelin.com/
>
> >> > They also have a developer network:
> >> >http://dev.viamichelin.com/
>
> >> > 2008/6/4 John Resig <jere...@...>:
>
> >> >> > It seems to indicate that jQuery assumes that no properties have been
> >> >> > added to Object.prototype?
> >> >> > Is it possible that jQuery should be using hasOwnProperty in "for ...
> >> >> > in" loops?
>
> >> >> That is certainly an option - but at the cost of performance. We've
> >> >> done testing of this in the past and have, for now, opted to err on
> >> >> the side of performance instead of ubiquitous compatibility. We may
> >> >> change this eventually but that's our reasoning, for now.
>
> >> >> --John