Hi,
Christoph Pfister wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, the problem is that those information is transmitted in a part
> that kaffeine doesn't look at. Of course it's possible to deal with
> LCN, the question is whether it's worth the effort (there is also the
> possibility of collisions: other countries might be using tag 0x83
> (=private) for something else). How important is that number? I think
> that you normally identify a channel by its name, not by a number (but
> ok, there are exceptions). You can also manually assign numbers to the
> channels (if you absolutely don't like the order) and sort by number.
Probably my "need" arises because I'm trying to use kaffeine as a Set
Top Box. In particular I use a remote where only digits are available,
so channel numbering is quite important, and it's very boring to
manually sort almost 100 channels. Besides the fact that MUX are changed
quite often, so one has to re-do the job quite often.
Maybe I'm just using kaffeine for the wrong puropose (for instance,
program recording or egp scheduling is not supported via dcop/OSD...)
Would you be interested in improving (maybe with my help?) that part of
kaffeine? I find kaffeine much better than other alternatives, because
it's easy to use and... it just works! (channel scan, adapter
recognition and so on...) But maybe we can add a few features about the
10-foot user interface.
Regards,
Alfredo
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register Now for Creativity and Technology (CaT), June 3rd, NYC. CaT
is a gathering of tech-side developers & brand creativity professionals. Meet
the minds behind Google Creative Lab, Visual Complexity, Processing, &
iPhoneDevCamp as they present alongside digital heavyweights like Barbarian
Group, R/GA, & Big Spaceship.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/creativitycat-com
_______________________________________________
kaffeine-user mailing list
kaffeine-user@...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kaffeine-user