Guys,
I did a simple test on my laptop writing a kerberos-unity project,
mimicing the server-unit project. I think that this should be a good
approach, as you don't have anymore dependency to deal with.
wdyt ?
Alex Karasulu a écrit :
> First of all this presumes the clients mirror the version of the
> server. I
> don't
> think you want that right? Also the client is an external (to apacheds)
> project
> to ApacheDS so I would put the correct version of the client into the
> dependencyManagement section. Then you don't need to specify the version
> of the artifact in the dependencies section for these clients.
>
> Secondly you want <scope>test</scope> in there for these dependencies
> if in
> fact you intend their scope to be test scope.
>
> Alex
>
> On 7/9/07, Enrique Rodriguez <
enriquer9@...> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 7/9/07, Alex Karasulu <
akarasulu@...> wrote:
>> > ...
>> > The dep is just fine especially if you make the dep have test scope.
>>
>> OK, one last question, can you review the following group/artifact
>> id's and make changes/suggestions before I deploy and add this to
>> server-unit:
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.directory.client.kerberos</groupId>
>> <artifactId>apacheds-kerberos-client</artifactId>
>> <version>${pom.version}</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.apache.directory.client.kerberos</groupId>
>> <artifactId>apacheds-password-client</artifactId>
>> <version>${pom.version}</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> Enrique
>>
>
