Re: Last Call: draft-reschke-webdav-search (Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH) to Proposed Standard

[Julian Reschke]

(FYI)

The IESG wrote:

> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
> the following document:
>
> - 'Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH '
>    <draft-reschke-webdav-search-17.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>
> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
> ietf@... mailing lists by 2008-08-11. Exceptionally,
> comments may be sent to iesg@... instead. In either case, please
> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>
> The file can be obtained via
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-webdav-search-17.txt
>
>
> IESG discussion can be tracked via
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=8611&rfc_flag=0
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF-Announce mailing list
> IETF-Announce@...
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

[Chris Newman-2]

It would be helpful if people who have reviewed this and support
advancement were to respond to the last call on the IETF list (or to
iesg@...) saying so.

The current IESG is a bit skeptical about any individual submission, so
it's helpful to have positive feedback during the last call to counter that.

                Thanks,
                - Chris

--On July 14, 2008 21:14:38 +0200 Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@...>
wrote:

>
> (FYI)
>
> The IESG wrote:
>> The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
>> the following document:
>>
>> - 'Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV) SEARCH '
>>    <draft-reschke-webdav-search-17.txt> as a Proposed Standard
>>
>> The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
>> final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
>> ietf@... mailing lists by 2008-08-11. Exceptionally,
>> comments may be sent to iesg@... instead. In either case, please
>> retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
>>
>> The file can be obtained via
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-reschke-webdav-search-17.txt
>>
>>
>> IESG discussion can be tracked via
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=
>> 8611&rfc_flag=0
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IETF-Announce mailing list
>> IETF-Announce@...
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

[Julian Reschke]

Hi,

here's a LC comment by myself: the specification should state that
SEARCH is a safe method (see
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.9.1.1>).

BR, Julian

[Julian Reschke]

Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> here's a LC comment by myself: the specification should state that
> SEARCH is a safe method (see
> <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.9.1.1>).
>
> BR, Julian

Fixed in -latest, adding:

"SEARCH is a safe method; it does not have any significance other than
executing a query and returning a query result (see [RFC2616], Section
9.1.1)."

(<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-search-latest.html#rfc.section.2.1>).

BR, Julian