Hi Pablo,
Pablo> License:
Pablo> What kind of license should be used (for the code and more important, the
Pablo> database)? A GPL like license to restrict usage to open source software or a
Pablo> LGPL like license? Or a non-commercial license? Can code licences be applied
Pablo> to databases?
I think the idea is great.
Databases are problematic from an open source point of view. I suggest
you ask this question directly to the FSF. They have a lot of
experience and will probably give us a good answer.
In many countries databases are now protected, but the underlying
facts are not (they are usually facts, that are not copyrightable). I
suspect camera correction parameters fall into this category.
This could be another reason why Tomas choose to encrypt his
database. In the US, if one tries to decipher a document (outside the
scope of the original license) then this person is breaking the
DMCA. So,
The DMCA does not protect the database, but it protects against
decryption of it.
--
dmg
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQTo post to this group, send email to
hugin-ptx@...
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx-unsubscribe@...
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---