But we'd all like to know at what point it rolls over and dies :-)
There's a reason that Derby is free and Oracle, DB2 etc cost budko bucks.
derby@... wrote:
> Billions of rows?
> Sounds like you'll need to rethink your design.
> Sure you can do it, but how efficient will it be?
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Tim Troup [mailto:
tim.troup@...]
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:55 AM
>>To: Derby Discussion
>>Subject: Limit on number of rows a table can hold?
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>>Is there a limit on the number of rows a table can hold?
>>I am planning on using derby as the RDBMS for a system that will
>>require tables to hold billions of rows.
>>
>>Thanks, Tim
>
>
>
>
--
A. Rick Anderson
