Bijan Parsia wrote:
>
> On Nov 15, 2006, at 9:52 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
>> The current OWL 1.1 Mapping to RDF Graphs draft [1] states
>>
>> "Not every OWL 1.1 ontology can be serialized in RDF. In particular,
>> ontologies using the following features of OWL 1.1 cannot be serialized:
>
> These statements should be read as qualified with "under the current
> mapping".
>
>> 1. punning and
>> 2. annotations on axioms."
>>
>> Could anyone please clarify the implications of this statement. Is
>> the plan of the group to leave it like this, or are changes to the OWL
>> 1.1 spec underway to ensure that there will be a complete mapping to
>> RDF Graphs? Or, will we see an "OWL 1.0.9" that will be complete in
>> RDF but with less features than 1.1?
>
> The RDF mapping has lagged behind the others, but the plan is to extend
> the mapping to cover these cases.
Presumably this will remain a purely syntactic mapping and the comment
in your "Next Steps for OWL" paper [1]:
"A triple syntax is being provided for OWL 1.1, syntactically
compatible with the triple syntax for OWL DL. However, for the above
reasons, this syntax could not be given a meaning compatible with the
RDF meaning for triples ..."
will still apply?
Dave
[1]
http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/acceptedLong/submission_11.pdf
