« Return to Thread: LoadShared Failover

Re: LoadShared Failover

by Michael Maymann :: Rate this Message:

| View in Thread

Hi,

Wietse: always nice with a bit of humor... :) !
I guess I then only need A records, as this will be our only mailserver inhouse for R&D.
Benny: I guess this is not needed then, but just out of curiosity: for a internal sending-only mailrelay why can't I use RFC1918 IPs ?

1. Is best practice to set this up with bonding then ?
2. How do I solve client<->server communication, when requests will not get answered from same IP - or can it be - and if so: how do I do this, is there a how-to on setting this up on RHEL6 ?


Thanks in advance :-) !
~maymann


2012/3/10 Benny Pedersen <me@...>
Den 2012-03-10 09:47, Michael Maymann skrev:

; zone file fragment
 IN MX 10 mail.example.com.
....
mail IN A 192.168.0.4
 IN A 192.168.0.5
 IN A 192.168.0.6

dont list rfc1918 ip in mx, but if its just a question on model, go for this solution


 « Return to Thread: LoadShared Failover