« Return to Thread: Lock-free atomic_shared_ptr?

Re: Lock-free atomic_shared_ptr<T>?

by Cory Nelson :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

On Jan 18, 2008 9:56 AM, Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@...> wrote:
> using shared_ptr<T> as a value type. The implementation I'm thinking
> of uses hazard pointers
> (http://erdani.org/publications/cuj-2004-12.pdf) and double-wide-cas
> (cmpxchg16b on x86-64). So I have three questions for this list:

Athlon 64s (pre-dual core) do not have cmpxchg16b - how do you plan to
get around that?

--
Cory Nelson
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

 « Return to Thread: Lock-free atomic_shared_ptr?