« Return to Thread: magnitude

Re: Memory/OS/Version

by Allan Yuan :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Hi.
first of all, both 6.7.1 and 6.9.1 should work. There are differences on
several simulation scenarios, but should be no difference on support for
windows vista os.

To run UMAT, there are several steps you've to finish:

First, you've to make sure that your computer hardware is supported by
Abaqus. Please consult the web, or local office of Abaqus or your hardware.

Second, you've to make sure that Visual Studio and Intel Frotran are
correctly installed. Configurations should be different for 64 bit OS than
32 bit ones. Please consult the web, or Microsoft and Intel to make sure.

Last, you've to make sure your OS environment variables are well set. Make
sure that your've using corrcect version of IFORT.EXE, LINK.EXE, and related
LIBs.

I guess you problems may root in the Abaqus version. You should use win86_64
install files. Please chech your product CDs. Environment variables should
also be checked to make sure that they're 64 bit versions.

Hope it helps.

  Best regards,

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Daniel Barboza
<danielbf.ufrj@...>wrote:

>
>
> Hello all,
> I'm using Abaqus 6.7.1 with Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 and Intel Fortran
> 9.1 to run the UMAT subroutines.
> My OS is Windows Vista 64-bit.
> To get the enviroment variables properly set when using the CAE, I run the
> IA32 directory ifortvars.bat
> Now, I see that I can only use 3Gb memory to run the analysis. How can I
> use more? Is my Abaqus version (6.7.1)  32 bit?
> I tried to use other ifortvars.bat, but I got linking problems.
> Would Abaqus 6.9.1 solve my problem? I'm seriously considering buying it.
> Using this topic for two subjects - What would be the advantages os Abaqus
> 6.9.1?
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Daniel Barboza
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
> http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 « Return to Thread: magnitude