Yes. I have defined a Java interface whose implementation is a Groovy class and then I am invoking this impl groovy class again from a Java class using GroovyShell/GroovyClassLoader - I set it up exactly as you mentioned in your first mail. I am attaching the code files that worked for me.
It is just that even after seeing it work, I did not understand the meaning of "this.metaClass = null". Does setting it to null make it re-assign its own per instance metaClass using the newly modified global EMC?
rgds,
Roshan
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Setya
<jsetya@...> wrote:
Hi,
>
> I am also trying to learn Groovy and I tried this thing and for me both
> the
> things worked -
>
> 1) setting this.metaClass = null in the MyGroovyClassImpl constructor in
> MyGroovyClassImpl.groovy
>
> 2) setting MyGroovyClassImpl.metaClass.getNext in a static block so that
> it
> happens only once.
>
> Can you please take out a few moments and explain the effect
> "this.metaClass
> = null" internally has? Does setting it null make the instance use the
> global metaclass that has been affected by setting
> "MyGroovyClassImpl.metaClass.getNext"?
Does your class implement a Java (not Groovy) interface ? and you invoke the
script exactly the way I did it from Java (not Groovy) ?
Regards,
Setya
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Method-created-via-ExpandoMetaClass-is-not-recognized-tp19108704p19113164.html
Sent from the groovy - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email