Re: Microinjection frustration (Jane Whittingham)

View: New views
1 Messages — Rating Filter:   Alert me  

Re: Microinjection frustration (Jane Whittingham)

by Kathryn Hedges-2 :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View Threaded | Show Only this Message



> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:42:04 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Jane Whittingham <ikklejaneo@...>
> Subject: [Celegans] Microinjection frustration
> To: celegans@...
> Message-ID: <213261.65125.qm@...>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I am desparately in need of some help with c. elegans
> microinjection.  ... from what I
> can tell, my problem is the recovery of the worms.  I
> use M9 buffer for recovery and they initially seem to
> recover really well, thrashing about in the M9, but once the
> M9 is absorbed into the plate and the worm adheres to the
> bacterial lawn, the head is still moving around a lot, but
> the back end of the worm seems almost paralysed and after a
> day or so the worm dies. 

Jane, I forwarded your message to our local microinjection expert (Jacob Varkey) and he suggested a different buffer than M9:

"Even though it is not necessary, in some cases, I have asked students to use a recovery buffer. There are different formulations of it. One is given below.

3mM HEPES (pH7.2), 3 mM CaCl2, 66mM NaCl, 2.4mM KCl, 4% glucose, 0.1% salmon sperm DNA.

Some people simply add 4% glucose to M9.

In either case, incubating the worms at 16 C for couple of hrs in recovery buffer (in a moist chamber) before transferring to a seeded plate is recommended."

J.Varkey


_______________________________________________
Celegans mailing list
Celegans@...
http://www.bio.net/biomail/listinfo/celegans