Re: Modular Build

by Scott Deboy :: Rate this Message:

I'd think we could just remove LF5 and Chainsaw V1 from the log4j source tree. They haven't been updated in years, and folks can use a prior release of log4j if they want to get to them.

Scott

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Antony Stubbs <antony.stubbs@...> wrote:

Hi guys, following on from my comment, I've uploaded a proposed
modularisation here:
http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/7c5b4689d5cc509d207e3270fc6f012ea8064c6d
http://github.com/astubbs/log4j/commit/ce3ce992d509e8c341914437bbc11442711fc5bf

As well as the module split, I would also do a more complete maven migration
(except for possibly the NT build stuff).

My immediate drive for this (apart from the other obvious benefits) is the
file size of the log4j jar (~800k). Removing LF5 alone removes 490k
(uncompressed).

I know this drives up the complexity, but I think it is worth if to get the
at least the GUI stuff out.

Cheers.

Antony Stubbs wrote:
>
> Hi guys, what's the established opinion from log4j about breaking
> log4j up into modules ie net, nt appender, chainsaw etc?
>
> Regards,
> Antony Stubbs
> Technical Architect - Prototyping
> Telecom Retail
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@...
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@...
>
>
>

> -----
> ___________________________
> http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
>

-----
___________________________

http://stubbisms.wordpress.com http://stubbisms.wordpress.com
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Modular-Build-tp28170343p28172026.html
Sent from the Log4j - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@...

« Return to Thread: Modular Build