Andrea Viarengo wrote:
> yes, probably "named nodes" are a better solution...
>
> A part the implementation,
> I have understood you like the addition of modules/plugin in Pipmak, right?
Yes, that seems like a good idea. I have a rough plan in my head and
will try to work it out once the "named nodes" thing is done. Speaking
of which, I have a prototype working (in a backwards-compatible way) at
this moment, but it still needs more rigorous testing, and updated
documentation.
-Christian
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/_______________________________________________
Pipmak-Users mailing list
Pipmak-Users@...
news://news.gmane.org/gmane.games.devel.pipmak.user
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pipmak-users
