« Return to Thread: More flexibility in the OSGi manifest headers

Re: More flexibility in the OSGi manifest headers

by W.B. Garvelink :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

James,


Thanks so far. I have created the issue (#454) and I'll happily work
with you and Bruce to tackle any issues that may come up.


Barend



On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:09 PM, James Lemieux <jplemieux@...> wrote:

> Hey Barend,
>
>    OSGi support was done by me working in conjunction with Bruce Alspaugh I
> believe. I believe he was using it in an Eclipse RCP app, and so the way we
> worked was:
>
> 1) I modified our build system
> 2) Bruce tested it in his environment
> 3) repeat 1) and 2) until it seemed to do everything we needed
>
> I'm not even close to an OSGi expert. And I've never used Eclipse (always
> IDEA).
>
> I have no problems making the changes you require as long as they are
> compatible for use in the Eclipse RCP environment. (Since OSGi is actually a
> standalone spec, I'll assume that this is an easy assumption).
>
> Bruce, if you're still lurking out there, would you be willing to retest the
> GL jar within an Eclipse RCP once again after we've made these changes?
>
> Barend, please file a bug  in the GL issue tracker so this work isn't lost
> for any reason.
>
> James

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@...

 « Return to Thread: More flexibility in the OSGi manifest headers