Hello List,
I am also using Mule2.0 in my work. I am using Mule JMS transport with OpenMQ JMS broker. My application is running on build server with Mule ESB for more then 15 days now. I encounter no problem so far.
I dont know the performance of earlier version of Mule i.e. Mule1.4.3.
I will recommend to migrate to Mule2.x. I hope documentation will be ready soon for Mule2.x.
Cheer,
Pawan Modi
We also do Mule 2.0.2 stuff in prod, about 35 different services. We have some small issues with stuff (email connector, FTP connector, WebsphereMQ non-JMS recipient patch), and not-yet-fully-explored behavior with XA (transaction management) and WebsphereMQ, but other than that it's been stable. Mule deployables (ours are wars deployed under Tomcat) run for months with no issues.
Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
I am using Mule 2.0.1 in production environment for non-critical application. I find it stable in terms that it doesn't crash randomly, have memory leaks or drop messages. That said, there are some rough edges and non-critical bugs/undocumented behavior, which are usually easy enough to work around.
I would recommend that you use 2.0 and save yourself the migration (btw, 1.x code line is more mature, but still far from perfect ;-)
Dimitar
