Re: Mule 2.x Stability

>
> Hello Antoine,
>
> I saw the white paper your provided link for. Is there any way to  
> publish
> information about the tests i performed?   I wish this information  
> will be
> very useful for them who hesitate to use Mule in their environment.  
> Many
> people drop their plans about using mule due to lack of  
> documentation &
> information.
>
> Let me know your thoughts.
>
> With regards,
> Pawan Modi
>
>
>
>
> antoine.borg wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pawan,
>>
>> This is great news - coupled with MuleSource's recent tests
>> (www.mulesource.com/solutions/Whitepaper_perf_test_results.pdf), it  
>> sounds
>> like those people who were hesitant to upgrade/use Mule 2 should be  
>> happy
>> to
>> do so now.
>>
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>> Antoine Borg, Senior Consultant | Tel: +32 28 504 696
>> ricston Ltd., BP 2, 1180 Uccle, Brussels, BELGIUM
>> email: antoine.borg@... | blog: blog.ricston.com | web:
>> ricston.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: PawanModi [mailto:modipawan8126@...]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 8:49 AM
>> To: user@...
>> Subject: Re: [mule-user] Mule 2.x Stability
>>
>>
>> Hello List,
>>
>> I am also using Mule2.0 in my work. I am using Mule JMS transport  
>> with
>> OpenMQ JMS broker. My application  is running on build server with  
>> Mule
>> ESB
>> for more then 15 days now. I encounter no problem so far.
>> I dont know the performance of earlier version of Mule i.e.  
>> Mule1.4.3.
>>
>> I will recommend to migrate to Mule2.x. I hope documentation will  
>> be ready
>> soon for Mule2.x.
>>
>> Cheer,
>> Pawan Modi
>>
>>
>>
>> Steve Olson wrote:
>>>
>>> We also do Mule 2.0.2 stuff in prod, about 35 different services.  
>>> We
>>> have some small issues with stuff (email connector, FTP connector,
>>> WebsphereMQ non-JMS recipient patch), and not-yet-fully-explored
>>> behavior with XA (transaction management) and WebsphereMQ, but other
>>> than that it's been stable.  Mule deployables (ours are wars  
>>> deployed
>>> under Tomcat) run for months with no issues.
>>>
>>>
>>> Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am using Mule 2.0.1 in production environment for non-critical
>>>> application. I find it stable in terms that it doesn't crash
>>>> randomly, have memory leaks or drop messages. That said, there are
>>>> some rough edges and non-critical bugs/undocumented behavior, which
>>>> are usually easy enough to work around.
>>>>
>>>> I would recommend that you use 2.0 and save yourself the migration
>>>> (btw, 1.x code line is more mature, but still far from perfect ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Dimitar
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Mule-2.x-Stability-tp19034298p19156706.html
>> Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>>
>>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Mule-2.x-Stability-tp19034298p19302737.html
> Sent from the Mule - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
>
>    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
>
>