« Return to Thread: Mumps M/DB and M/DBX

Re: Mumps M/DB and M/DBX

by andrey-google :: Rate this Message:

Hi,
MUMPS is very powerful. We use it in conjunction with Erlang.
Architecture is {Web application -> Erlang middleware -> MUMPS}. In
fact, we use MUMPS from Intersystems Cache DB, but it is quite the same
as GT.M. I can't remember any cons, it really save much time for us.
Both MUMPS (especially Cache) and Erlang complement each other quite
well. Perhaps, you have more concrete questions?

Andrew

Kunthar wrote:

> I'd really appreciated to get pros and cons, if anyone used before
> those DB types.
> What you think about GT.M and extended clone of M/DB?
>
>
> http://www.mgateway.com/
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mdb-community-forum
> http://www.fidelityinfoservices.com/FNFIS/Markets/NonfinancialIndustries/Healthcare/gtm/
>
> Peace
> \|/ Kunth
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
erlang-questions (at) erlang.org

« Return to Thread: Mumps M/DB and M/DBX