« Return to Thread: Mumps M/DB and M/DBX

Re: Mumps M/DB and M/DBX

by Kunthar :: Rate this Message:

Let me be more specific then :)

1. Seems it supports ACID, is this clear?
2. What about transaction speed? Any benchmarks would be cool.
3. Is Erlang Middleware is also shareable like new M/DB or should i
need to dig in myself?
4. How scalable is?
5. Is this support like multidimensional array data types?
6. How painful to/from convert data types of Erlang?

Peace
\|/ Kunthar

On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:04 AM, Andrew<buricchio@...> wrote:

> Hi,
> MUMPS is very powerful. We use it in conjunction with Erlang. Architecture
> is {Web application -> Erlang middleware -> MUMPS}. In fact, we use MUMPS
> from Intersystems Cache DB, but it is quite the same as GT.M. I can't
> remember any cons, it really save much time for us. Both MUMPS (especially
> Cache) and Erlang complement each other quite well. Perhaps, you have more
> concrete questions?
>
> Andrew
>
>
> Kunthar wrote:
>>
>> I'd really appreciated to get pros and cons, if anyone used before
>> those DB types.
>> What you think about GT.M and extended clone of M/DB?
>>
>>
>> http://www.mgateway.com/
>> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/mdb-community-forum
>>
>> http://www.fidelityinfoservices.com/FNFIS/Markets/NonfinancialIndustries/Healthcare/gtm/
>>
>> Peace
>> \|/ Kunth
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org
>>
>>
>>
>
>

________________________________________________________________
erlang-questions mailing list. See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
erlang-questions (at) erlang.org

« Return to Thread: Mumps M/DB and M/DBX