Re: NOT for Panoramas

> The range is rather
> narrower than some, but is OK if you have the usual 18-70 (or whatever)
> to go with it for the wider stuff. I looked at all of these choices,
> although I must admit that although I like the image quality of the
> Nikon it was outside my price range. I was warned off the Sigma 10-20
> by an apparently knowledgeable camera shop assistant, but I have no
> experience to back up his opinion.
>
> I like the colour rendition of this lens, and image quality is very
> good, although you can find chromatic aberration at the outer edges
> if you zoom in far enough. It's easily removed in RAW, though...
>
> Roger W.
>
> --
> Work: www.adex-japan.com
> Play: www.usefilm.com/member/roger
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> --
>
>
>
>