On Thu, 08 May 2008 15:10:27 +0900, AYRTON <
avi@...> wrote:
> On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Roger D. Williams <
roger@...>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> You might also like to consider the Tamron 11-18.
>
>
> Thanks Roger
> Do you have one ???
> And do you like it ?
>
> I can't find any reviews on that lens ...
I have it and LOVE it. It is only ever off my D200 when I have my Nikon
10.5mm fisheye on. I do have the set zoom that came with the D200,
18-70mm, but I seldom use it. I'm a wide guy... <g>
Roger W.
> Cheers
> AYRTON
>
>
>
>> The range is rather
>> narrower than some, but is OK if you have the usual 18-70 (or whatever)
>> to go with it for the wider stuff. I looked at all of these choices,
>> although I must admit that although I like the image quality of the
>> Nikon it was outside my price range. I was warned off the Sigma 10-20
>> by an apparently knowledgeable camera shop assistant, but I have no
>> experience to back up his opinion.
>>
>> I like the colour rendition of this lens, and image quality is very
>> good, although you can find chromatic aberration at the outer edges
>> if you zoom in far enough. It's easily removed in RAW, though...
>>
>> Roger W.
>>
>> --
>> Work: www.adex-japan.com
>> Play: www.usefilm.com/member/roger
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Work: www.adex-japan.com
Play: www.usefilm.com/member/roger
