> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>> The Note Well says in part
>>> ...which are addressed to:
>>> • The IETF plenary session
>>> • The IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG
>>> • Any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working
>>> group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF
>>> • Any IETF working group or portion thereof
>>> • The IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB
>>> • The RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function
>> Does this need to be expanded to include the other stream editors ? Or
>> do the other streams need their own Note Well ?
>> https://hembanken.danskebank.se/html/index.html?site=OENB&secsystem=KO > Aren't the other stream editors covered by the "RFC Editor" concept?
> They all result in RFCs.
> Note - I don't think "the RFC Editor" in the Note Well was ever intended
> to refer to a single person; it was always the function.
The question then becomes one of whether that was for approval purposes,
and then whether that same checking process can be automated so that the
webform or other automated submission system could be used to
automatically approve and publish a submission.