On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:04:46PM +0200, Alain Frisch wrote:
> Andres Varon wrote:
>> Thanks for the good work. I would like to know exactly what
>> architectures support the native Dynlink? I did not see this
>> information in the release notes.
> The native Dynlink is known to work under Linux x86, Linux AMD64, Win32
> (mingw/msvc ports). It has been lightly tested under Win64, some flavors
> of BSDs and also the Cygwin port.
[ Sorry for being lazy to check by myself, but apparently the question
is of wide-interest. ]
Is that something that packagers should worry about or not? I mean,
the specific modules/libraries/... are already detected by configure
and not built/installed/... on architectures missing them or should we
(packages) enforce that?
Many thanks in advance (and for native Dynlink of course :-))!
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>-
http://upsilon.cc/zack/Dietro un grande uomo c'รจ sempre /oo\ All one has to do is hit the right
uno zaino -- A.Bergonzoni \__/ keys at the right time -- J.S.Bach
_______________________________________________
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-listArchives:
http://caml.inria.frBeginner's list:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginnersBug reports:
http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
