Re: ORM for haskell?

Mads Lindstrøm <mads_lindstroem@...> writes:

> I do not get this explanation, could you expand? I would have thought it
> should be: "difference? Because SQLAlchemy knows about the relationships
> (not relations, but relation_ships_), it do not have to explicitly join
> on foreign keys.".

I think this is a common terminology issue - lots of people think
"relational" refers linking tables together (foreign keys), and not the
mathematical definition of a relation as a subset of T1 x T2 x ... x
Tn -- i.e. a table.

-k
--
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@...
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe