Thank you all for your comments.
> Please note that the file you were using (owl.owl) is in the process of
> being updated. Once that is complete and published you should be able to
> load it in the editor of your choice and have the same experience you did
> with the OWL 1 owl.owl file.
I was a bit puzzled not being able to find an OWL 2 specific file/URI
in the OWL 2 related documentation but not any more :)
> There are some people (myself included) who think this is not a good way to
> learn or explore OWL (1 or 2). There was quite a debate about it between me
> (anti) and Holger Knublauch (pro) recently which you might find interesting:
>
> <
http://www.w3.org/mid/B6D22E33-5332-4CF3-8582-F6A033BE4C7B@...>
Thanks for the interesting thread. As an OWL user, my idea was not to
use the owl.owl file as a starting point for new ontology models.
However, I find it useful when it is open on an ontology editor as a
separate "quick look-up kind-of reference card" of the OWL modelling
elements (specially for those less frequently used).
Cheers,
Bene Rodriguez
