Re: One time string section: new group or separate ARs?

> 2009/4/20 Age Bosma <agebosma@...>:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Have a look at the booklet page 7 at:
>> http://www.cover-paradies.to/?Module=ViewEntry&ID=408676
>>
>> There's a series of credits applying to two tracks on the Hard Candy
>> release [1] by Counting Crows. In the booklet it is credited as 'Jerry
>> Hey String Section', listing all artist performing in the string
>> section. This was, however, just a one time string section for just the
>> two tacks.
>>
>> I'm personally tempted to create a new group named 'Jerry Hey String
>> Section' including all the artist credited in the booklet. I could also
>> add the complete list of credits to both tracks separately.
>> The disadvantage of the first option would be that the specific
>> instrument credits will get lost (but can be stored in an annotation),
>> the disadvantage of the second option is that the list of tracks ARs
>> will get quite extensive.
>>
>> What is your opinion? Which option has you preference?
>>
>> Age
>>
>>
>> [1] http://musicbrainz.org/release/55e9a60a-4d04-44c9-9b33-b62a778b1c78.html
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MusicBrainz-users mailing list
>> MusicBrainz-users@...
>> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-users
>>
>
> I'd be for the second option.  You can add each relationship just once
> if you use the option of relating to tracks on a release (via Relate
> To... release) to create two relationships simultaneously rather than
> relating to each track itself separately.