« Return to Thread: Open Service Definition (revisited)

Re: Open Service Definition (revisited)

by Rufus Pollock :: Rate this Message:

Reply to Author | View in Thread

Luis Villa wrote:

> On 7/30/07, Francis Irving <francis@...> wrote:
>> Rufus - perhaps when Luis has got a bit further and clarified the
>> language and options, we should have a meeting in Cambridge to work
>> out what, if anything, OKFN needs to do?
>
> My sense is that sometime in the next 6-12 months someone (perhaps
> OKFN, perhaps someone else) will have to convene an (private(?),
> invite-only(?)) summit of the key players* to hammer something out,
> much as OSI was hammered out early on, but hopefully with less
> crossfire.
>
> Luis
>
> * both on the policy side (OKFN, CC, etc.) and on the implementation
> side (anyone implementing open-ish services- wikipedia, Red Hat,
> Joyent(?) etc.)

On the idea of meeting up I think the first thing would be to put
together an OSD draft and then put that out there and solicit comments
as heavily as possible.

I also think it would be great for people to have local meetings -- as
Francis suggested we should do one here in Cambridge (UK). Whether we
could find the resources to bring people together from all over the
world is a bigger question -- perhaps it would make sense to organize
special sessions at other events (we could certainly have one at next
year's OKCON).

Regards,

Rufus

_______________________________________________
okfn-discuss mailing list
okfn-discuss@...
http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss

 « Return to Thread: Open Service Definition (revisited)