Re: OpenJDK Bugzilla server rollout
|
View:
New views
3 Messages
—
Rating Filter:
Alert me
|
 |
|
|
|
Re: OpenJDK Bugzilla server rollout
by Brad Wetmore
::
Rate this Message:
> thank you for setting up the Bugzilla instance. You're welcome. > I've just visited it > and wondered that the product "sanbox" contains the two components > "C1" and "C2" w When I first set up the play area (sandbox), it passed through my mind that c1/c2 might be mistaken for the hotspot components. I've renamed them to avoid the confusion. > while the product "hotspot" has no components. Shouldn't > C1 and C2 be components of hotspot? At this point, we're just accepting contributions, and decided to just make an initial category called other for that. When we start using bugzilla to accept general bugs, we'll add those additional components such as c1/c2 for hotspot. Soon, we'll be asking the various groups to start defining the components they'd like to use. > Also the link on the "Component" label shows an explanation of the > Products. A corresponding help page for Components would be however > usefull as well. Not sure I'm following. Bringing up bug 100000: http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100000 has a link on the component label, which is: http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/describecomponents.cgi?product=sandbox That page has the info about the product and component: ---begin--- This is a sandbox where you can file bogus bugs to learn the Bugzilla interface. Component Default Assignee Default QA Contact component1 watch-sandbox-component1@... The first component of the sandbox product. component2 watch-sandbox-component2@... The second component of the sandbox product. ---end--- Thanks, Brad > > On 2/7/09, Brad Wetmore <Bradford.Wetmore@...> wrote: >> As I posted on the discuss list earlier this week [1], I have set up an >> instance of Bugzilla for use by the various OpenJDK efforts. >> >> The system is now live. Please see the project page at: >> >> http://openjdk.java.net/groups/web/bugzilla.html >> >> for general notes, instructions, and the URL. >> >> I've made an initial pass at configuration with feedback from several >> folks, but I know we will continue tuning this system to best fit our >> needs. >> >> The OpenJDK web group mailing list will be the best place for discussion: >> >> web-discuss at openjdk dot java dot net >> >> Just a reminder: at this point, this instance is only for tracking >> contributions from those developers without push permissions. It will >> soon expand to track most if not all of the OpenJDK bugs. General bugs >> should continue to be filed through: >> >> http://bugs.sun.com >> >> On to the next stage(s). >> >> Thanks, >> Brad >> >> [1] >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2009-February/001511.html >> >> >> |
|
|
Re: OpenJDK Bugzilla server rollout
by Volker Simonis
::
Rate this Message:
Please see my comments inline..
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Brad Wetmore <Bradford.Wetmore@...> wrote: > >> thank you for setting up the Bugzilla instance. > > You're welcome. > >> I've just visited it >> >> and wondered that the product "sanbox" contains the two components >> "C1" and "C2" w > > When I first set up the play area (sandbox), it passed through my mind that > c1/c2 might be mistaken for the hotspot components. I've renamed them to > avoid the confusion. > >> while the product "hotspot" has no components. Shouldn't >> C1 and C2 be components of hotspot? > > At this point, we're just accepting contributions, and decided to just make > an initial category called other for that. When we start using bugzilla to > accept general bugs, we'll add those additional components such as c1/c2 for > hotspot. Soon, we'll be asking the various groups to start defining the > components they'd like to use. > >> Also the link on the "Component" label shows an explanation of the >> Products. A corresponding help page for Components would be however >> usefull as well. > > Not sure I'm following. Bringing up bug 100000: > > http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100000 > > has a link on the component label, which is: > > http://bugs.openjdk.java.net/describecomponents.cgi?product=sandbox > > That page has the info about the product and component: > > ---begin--- > This is a sandbox where you can file bogus bugs to learn > the Bugzilla interface. > > Component Default Assignee Default QA Contact > > component1 watch-sandbox-component1@... > The first component of the sandbox product. > > component2 watch-sandbox-component2@... > The second component of the sandbox product. > ---end--- > I was referring to the "Advanced search page" https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/query.cgi The "Component" label on that page has a link to https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/describecomponents.cgi which describes the available "Products" while the "Product" lable has no link. > Thanks, > > Brad > > > >> >> On 2/7/09, Brad Wetmore <Bradford.Wetmore@...> wrote: >>> >>> As I posted on the discuss list earlier this week [1], I have set up an >>> instance of Bugzilla for use by the various OpenJDK efforts. >>> >>> The system is now live. Please see the project page at: >>> >>> http://openjdk.java.net/groups/web/bugzilla.html >>> >>> for general notes, instructions, and the URL. >>> >>> I've made an initial pass at configuration with feedback from several >>> folks, but I know we will continue tuning this system to best fit our >>> needs. >>> >>> The OpenJDK web group mailing list will be the best place for >>> discussion: >>> >>> web-discuss at openjdk dot java dot net >>> >>> Just a reminder: at this point, this instance is only for tracking >>> contributions from those developers without push permissions. It will >>> soon expand to track most if not all of the OpenJDK bugs. General bugs >>> should continue to be filed through: >>> >>> http://bugs.sun.com >>> >>> On to the next stage(s). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Brad >>> >>> [1] >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2009-February/001511.html >>> >>> >>> > |
| Free embeddable forum powered by Nabble | Forum Help |
