You omitNorms(), did you also omitTf()?
when something like
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345 gets commited, you will have a posibility to see some benefits (e.g. by packing single postings lists as Filters). The code there optimises exactly that case as filters contain no Scoring information ...
try:
----- Original Message ----
> From: Nigel <
nigelspleen@...>
> To:
java-user@...
> Sent: Friday, 26 June, 2009 4:11:53
> Subject: Optimizing unordered queries
>
> I recently posted some questions about performance problems with large
> indexes. One key thing about our situation is that we don't need sorted
> results (either by relevance or any other key). I've been looking into our
> memory usage and tracing through some code, which in combination with the
> recent posts about setTermInfosIndexDivisor got me thinking about the best
> way to do a query where the order of results doesn't matter.
>
> Currently we're (perhaps naively) doing the equivalent of
> query.weight(searcher).scorer(reader).score(collector). Obviously there's a
> certain amount of unnecessary calculation that results from this if you
> don't care about sorting. Are there any general recommendations for
> unordered searching? (We already omit norms.)
>
> (More details: Of particular interest are things that access the TermInfos,
> since that's the major source of RAM usage: if a smaller number of TermInfos
> were needed then we could perhaps use an aggressive index divisor setting to
> save RAM without a performance penalty. For example, I was thinking about a
> custom Similarity implementation that skipped the idf calculations, since
> those have to hit the TermInfos.)
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
java-user-unsubscribe@...
For additional commands, e-mail:
java-user-help@...