Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012 schrieb Modestas Vainius:
> On 2012 m. of March 15 d., Thursday 12:42:17 Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 13. März 2012 schrieb Sune Vuorela:
> > > On 2012-03-13, Modestas Vainius <modax@...> wrote:
> > > > kdepim 4.7 is crap, you don't want to use it
> > > > if you value your data.
> > >
> > > I officially disagree.
> > Hmmm. I never did test it.
> > From what I read on kdepim and kdepim-users mailing lists there have
> > been quite some users having had severe issues with it. There may be
> > quite some users not having issues and these may be less vocal about
> > it tough.
> > Anyway I read that KDE developers fixed lots and lots of bugs have
> > for KDEPIM 4.8 and 4.8.1 and are still being fixed. And did quite
> > some performance improvements.
> > Thus from what said I suggest not to use the older KDEPIM 4.7.x, but
> > instead KDEPIM 4.8.1 or (preferably) 4.8.2 when its out or even
> > 4.8.3 or later. I do hope that later 4.8.x versions of KDEPIM will
> > be suitable for production use and I wonder what the plans on
> > official KDEPIM 2 packages for Debian are.
> FWIW, I was referring to kdepim 4.7, not *4.8*.
Yes, I know. I didn´t want to hint at something else.
> In fact, we will
> probably upload kdepim 4.8.x together with KDE SC 4.8.x. But that's
> for future.
> I said it was crap because I actually lost mails with kdepim 4.7 when I
> tried it.
Well thats exactly what I like to avoid ;).
Thanks for clarifying,
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7